Points from Pittodrie
The weather was all that could be desired, and not one bit anything to complain about on that score. This, combined with the good football fare put forward was the means of the £130 gate being an accomplished fact. May this good financial support continue. We would have preferred to see the Third Lanark on Cup-Tie business rather than a friendly. At time of the season the Glasgow clubs have to keep themselves in trim, and cannot afford to risk much on a paltry friendly. This explanation will, perhaps, suffice to assure, the spectators, who thought the visitors were playing their hardest that this was not the case. There is no denying that the homesters played a hard game, and a good one. We congratulate them on their display. To the players themselves, a few tips must have been the outcome of this game. The visitors played a scientific and cool game, while the homesters rushed about here, there, and everywhere, and used about twice the amount of exertion. Whitehouse and his backs did not get much to do until the latter end of the second period, when they showed a tough defensive game during the heavy pressure. Neilson was the best of a good going half line. At centre half Kennedy, a junior on trial, showed a fine conception of the game and should come yet. Sloan had the worst wing to negotiate, and did well under the circumstances. His penalty was a beauty. Campbell was the shining light in the Third's front rank, and has evidently lost none of his cuteness. He looks fit for more than one other season. McKenzie and Wilson, inside left, were the only other ones in the forward line to show good play. The latter, despite his years, is still speedy and clever while on the ball. The outside men did practically nil. Johnston seemed lazy, while Barc1ay, a junior was too anxious to do himself justice. A notable feature in the visitors' play was the almost entire absence of rough or foul play. Would those concerned in the home team please note this fact, and emulate the example set them. Barrett gave his best display of the season. He deserves a par to himself after, giving such a fine exhibition. J. Mackie also played well, and was easily the better back. We should have liked to have seen McNicoll in his usual place as McGregor was very shaky. The halves played a really fine, hard and telling game. They were ahead of the opposition trio in everything but placing. In this they were sadly deficient. If this would be remedied, then Aberdeen's defence against attack would be greatly strengthened. The forwards, with the exception of the left wing, did not show anything brilliant. McAulay was the pick. Freeland showed good form, and is worthy of further trials. We think that the committee would do well to give McKay a prolonged rest, as no one can expect good work from a man with an injured knee. That he has good football in him no one will deny, and his real worth cannot be shown until he is physically fit. The crowd was a big one, and a critical one, and aimed especially towards the referee. Personally, we don't see how they were justified in hooting and howling at Mr. Arthur Watt, as to our mind, he was quite correct and fair in his decisions. There is, however, a great deal of prejudice shown to any visiting team from Glasgow, and, perhaps, this has something to do with their childish and unfair action.
Source: Bon-Accord, January 14, 1904
Source: Aberdeen Journal, 11th January 1904