The weather was far from favourable from the spectators point of view, and a £15 gate was not bad for the day, and also the match. What's in a name? Huntly's team included 6 local juniors! They were all the most prominent players for the visitors. Douglas kept a splendid goal. The Aberdeen directorate could have dispensed with Barret had they signed thisn man on. Hannah gave a great display at back. Henderson also did well but was overshadowed by his partner. The halves were a poor lot as halves, but they did their share of the defensive work very pluckily. Mitchell was most prominent. The forwards have a fair conception of the game; but lacked ability to put it to much use. For the home side Ritchie had a thinking part most of the game and indulged in some dumb-bell exercises to keep himself warm. Mackie and Brebner were very safe at the back. Mackie assisted the forwards towards the close and scored the winning goal. The halves played more as forwards for the most part and did a lot of shooting. They were no more successful at this than were the forwards. The forwards' display was, generally speaking, nothing short of disgraceful. They worked fairly in the open, but their ideas of where the goal was were rather hazy. Freeland performed well and sent in some fine centres, but Macdonald's shooting abilities are on a par with his other powers. The refereeing of Mr. Thomson does not call for comment. It calls for wonder. Had the Whites taken all their chances the scores would have been very different. N.
Source: Bon-Accord, January 21, 1904
Source: Aberdeen Journal, 18th January 1904